![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Donoghue v StevensonThe Paisley Snail MiniTrial1. The Facts – a brief summaryThis is a civil action – between two individuals. It is not a criminal prosecution – by the state. The facts are simple. On 26th August Mrs May Donoghue was in the Wellmeadow Café in Paisley with a friend who bought her a drink. Mrs Donoghue had consumed part of bottle of ginger beer – as part of an ice-cream float. At that point all was well. However, when the rest of the bottle was poured into her glass out floated what appeared to be the rotting remains of a decomposing snail. That caused May Donoghue to feel very unwell – or so she claimed. She sued the manufacturer of the ginger beer – David Stevenson. Many civil cases are decided by a judge sitting without a jury (at a hearing called a “Proof”) but this particular case has now come to a “Jury Trial” – to be decided by a jury. We will be following, in essence, the sort of court procedure that is actually used in the Court of Session in Edinburgh – albeit modified for the purposes of MiniTrial. Will May Donoghue succeed? What will the verdict be? What sum, if any, will be awarded as damages? |
|